Tuesday, March 20, 2012

President Tin Ear

Note: I wrote the post below last night, put it up, took it down, and am now putting it up again, with the updates that I also wrote last night. Because the story kept getting scrubbed (see updates), I initially thought that maybe the disclosure of the vacation trip represented a mistake on the part of the White House communications people, and that perhaps this isn't the kind of thing one should draw attention to, for security purposes; after all, why else would everybody, including Drudge, be taking the piece down? However, the original story has now been swamped by one far more interesting: why did the story disappear so rapidly, without explanation, from so many different news outlets? And if security really is a concern, why would the Obamas let one of their children go to Mexico in the first place? Oaxaca is not one of the places subject to a State Department travel advisory, but still - it's MEXICO, dude! Possibly the story isn't true at all; at least one person noted that Malia's school doesn't let out for spring break until next week. But then why flush it, without explanation, down the memory hole rather than formally retract it?

President Obama has been consistently criticized for his family's frequent and expensive vacations in a time of considerable economic woe; to me, that's only mildly interesting. The employment of 25 Secret Service personnel for this trip, however, is, in my opinion, newsworthy - as is the scrubbing of the story from the web.


The President’s been banging the drum for exports lately, but in exporting one of his daughters to Mexico, he may have gone too far.
Barack Obama’s eldest daughter is spending her spring break in the historic Mexican city of Oaxaca in the company of 12 friends – and 25 Secret Service agents.
Maybe I’m behind the times, but it used to be that, when you talked about “students” and “spring break”, you’d be talking about college students (ok, maybe high school students, too). Since when do 13-year-olds go to Mexico on spring break? Perhaps more to the point, with a bad economy, high unemployment, an anemic recovery, trillion-dollar deficits, is it good optics for the president to send yet another member of his family on an expensive vacation? With 12 friends and 25 freakin’ Secret Service agents?

Oh, and I’m sure this is just one of those crazy things: this story was one of the lead items on Yahoo News earlier today, and when you clicked on the link, you got the story about Malia’s trip to Mexico; however, very shortly after the story appeared, when you clicked on the link, it took you to an absolutely un-newsworthy story about a singer in Senegal taking part in local (Senegalese) politics. Now the headline has disappeared altogether, and the story isn’t listed in the expanded list of today’s headlines.

Update: Here's another coincidence; the Huffington Post piece that I had originally linked has also vanished. The headline still comes up when you Google "Obama's daughter", but the link just leads to HP's home page.

Update II: The link in the main post above is to a post at Pat Dollard's blog; he provides a link to the original story in the Telegraph, and if you hit that link, you now get a 404.

Update III: Why, the whole thing is an internet phenomenon! The Tatler has more.

Update IV: The Daily Caller has picked up on both the vacation and the vigorous internet scrubbing.

9 comments:

JeffS said...

The INTERNET scrubbing is indeed newsworthy. Generally speaking, the cover up is the bigger mistake. That demonstrates that they know they did something wrong.

missred said...

Yes, I saw the story early in the day at the Telegraph and posted it to my blog. I then went around other news sites to find it and nothing. I saw it a couple of hours later at the Daily Mail. By then the article in the Telegraph was gone. I went back to post an update and the Daily Mail was gone. So I googled the story - it had been posted on the Huffington Post, but that was gone. Very interesting times indeed.

RebeccaH said...

See, the Obamas don't want news reporters taking pictures of their daughters. Except when they do want them to.

mojo said...

AND a 7.n earthquake in Gurrero State last night...

But - the US President letting his daughter traipse off to a country where some folks would just LOVE to have a really, really good hostage?

NOT news.

Gregoryno6 said...

The trip never happened and you should certainly not believe or propagate the rumour that Obama's daughter went to Mexico for a meeting with her father's alien masters.
Although it might be fun if you did.

Anonymous said...

Deborah Leigh said...Now you see it, now you don't. Obama's idea of freedom of the press.

Sounds like a swell vaca to me. Twenty-five people with ear pieces looking very nervous shadowing her every move because you're the president's daughter in a narco country. What was the other option? Burma? Maybe Malia should give Chelsea a ring. Well, at least she won't have to sit on her luggage for hours on a train as I did lo those many years ago. Vaya con Dios!

JeffS said...

Not entirely scrubbed!

But give it a few moments.....

Michael Lonie said...

Didn't Jenna Bush hike to Compostela with one Secret Service agent as a guard? Of course, Spain didn't have a Narco Cartel War going at that time. Whatever came over Obama (and Michelle) to let their 13 year old daughter go off to Oaxaca, even with 25 armed chaperones?

Getting the MSM, including in Blighty, to pull the story so quickly indicates a well developed censorship capability. I'll bet Obama is anxious to use it this fall.

Paco said...

Michael: that may well be the most important angle to this story.