"Dems Worrying About Freaky Senate Candidate *Not* Named Platner, Too".
Democrats have an opportunity to hold onto a Senate seat in Michigan, and probably could – if they could manage to nominate a candidate that has some appeal to the electorate that voted for Donald Trump. Instead, Democrats are about to nominate another extreme candidate that could allow Republicans to expand their majority in the upper chamber. And Abdul el-Sayed might join Graham Platner as the national brand of a party that wants to run for the fringes...Where are all the moderate Democrats?
"You ain't gonna like the answer, buddy!"
Eh, it doesn't matter, the Dem will win, sometimes it takes a little longer to find... I mean, count the votes.
ReplyDeleteLook at the LA mayoral race. Pratt is about to lose, they're not even hiding the blatant cheating.
The total votes to be counted changes and suddenly he's 1% ahead of third with 77% counted.
Every Dim candidate is "freaky."
ReplyDeleteAnd what they're "worrying" about is having to get a fraudulent vote counting scheme in place before the election because their candidate IS "freaky."
As we see in LA, the margin of fraud in CA is 'whatever it takes', so the quality, or lack thereof, matters not when it's a Dem cheating.
ReplyDeleteCA and our fine media betters are acting as if the third place candidate hugely outperforming 1 and 2 in late-counted, helicoptered-in, ballots is normal.
The worst part? It's probably all legal.
If you can register with a note from Epstein's mom, then there is no cheating.