I have always liked Kipling’s poem because of its sobering, yet wryly humorous, message concerning the consequences of ignoring the natural law. A majority of my fellow citizens have done precisely that, by heaving a flashy, but dangerous, poseur into the White House, apparently in the belief that what the ship of state really needs, as it navigates the perilous seas of a dangerous world, is a captain who is the rankest landlubber. So, in the midst of economic chaos that has nearly battered the global banking system to its knees, and foreign intrigues being hatched by lunatics who either have, or are developing, a nuclear weapons capability, we have elected Mr. Barack Obama, exclusively on the strength of his affidavit that he does not share the anti-capitalist and anti-American prejudices of practically everyone with whom he has been professionally associated for the last 20 years. I can only pray that Kipling’s home truths sink in quickly, and that the people begin educating themselves in time to return Mr. Obama to private life after one term.
Will he be another Jimmy Carter, or will he be the George McGovern that we were blissfully spared in 1972? I tend to feel that neither one of these comparisons really hits the mark; Obama doesn’t strike me as being as utterly vacuous as Carter, nor as naïve as McGovern. I think he is more of a Lyndon Johnson: potentially thuggish in his exercise of power, an enemy of genuine transparency in government, a machine politician to the core, but with more polish than LBJ, and with a strong, underlying commitment to leftist ideology that the Texan probably would have abhorred. There is at least the possibility that Americans have elected, for the first time in my life, at any rate, not a leader, but a ruler. As one of William Faulkner’s characters said, “God have mercy on us, poor sons of bitches.”
The tectonics of the American political scene reveal a dangerous shift in ideology and in the perceptions and understanding of historical reality. The liberal fascism so admirably described by Jonah Goldberg is setting down roots everywhere: no longer just in Hollywood and in the mainstream media and in the fever swamps of academe, but among the clueless millions who have come to take their freedoms for granted and are willing to give them up, one by one, in exchange for the comforting, but false, assurances that their government knows what’s best for them and not only can, but should, protect them from pain and suffering and angst – the state as psychological and political womb.
Well, we shall see, we shall see. I confess that, for purely selfish reasons, I see an upside to this electoral result: with Obama in the White House, we conservative bloggers have hit the mother lode of source material. In fact, there is so much gold to go around, I am considering the possibility of setting up another blog that will serve as a clearing house for information on the crimes, frauds, misdemeanors and low comedy of this administration and its parent organization, the Democratic Party.
I believe it is necessary for everyone who can, to sound the alarm about what is happening to our country at the hands of unscrupulous power mongers, and to grab the lumpish part of the electorate by the lapels and make them think. Lionel Trilling wrote that we have a moral responsibility to be intelligent, i.e., the consequences of intellectual indolence, of a distaste for the sometimes hard effort involved in thinking clearly, and acting accordingly, can lead to the ultimate destruction not only of an individual, but of a society, a country, a civilization; thus, since we are all at risk, we are all responsible, in some measure, for what we do, and for what we fail to do.
So, time to get cracking. A few lessons to apply going forward.
1) The Republican Party needs to get back to first principles. We are (or should be) the party in favor of individual liberty, personal responsibility, smaller government and a strong, consistent foreign policy. We should completely reject the notion that listing to port is ever going to enable us to become the majority party; when it comes to government handouts dressed up as “compassion”, populist demagoguery, rants against Wall Street, and a pusillanimous foreign policy, we can never be anything but a “me too” party. But far more importantly, power for the sake of power is not the goal, anyway. This is not about putting people in office solely for the reason that they have an ‘R’ by their names; this is about ideals and noble traditions and historical memory and maintaining our status as a free people.
2) It’s fine to complain about the bias of the mainstream media; it’s a moral obligation, in fact. But Republicans have to realize that the media will always be against them. We have to find ways to go directly to the American people, to do an end-run around our self-appointed “gatekeepers”. In this, the media are unwittingly beginning to provide assistance; both television and dead-tree organizations have so utterly undermined their credibility that their influence is waning. The rise of the blogosphere is important in this connection, and is likely to become more so, as people look for alternative sources of information. The challenge for bloggers is to develop stronger networks among themselves, and to engage in closer cooperation with grassroots organizations on the Right. The Republican National Committee needs to wake up and see the blogosphere for the gold mine of information and original investigative reporting that it is. And finally, right-wing bloggers need, collectively, to take a more activist role in engaging with the MSM, politicians (at the state, as well as the national level), and government agencies. If we wait around for someone to send a link to one of our posts to, say, the Washington Post, we may wait a very long time if we’re expecting a response. We need to take a leaf from the Obama playbook, and “get in their faces”, let them know that we’re watching and reading and that we’re going to call them out when they show bias or ignorance (yes, this is a 24/7 mission).
3) Things got nasty this election, particularly with the guerilla tactics used by the lefty blogs and by the proliferation of radical organizations (e.g., Code Pink) that are now playing a bigger role in mobilizing opinion. These tactics were aped by the MSM, vide the hunt for dirt on Joe the Plumber and Cindy McCain. In fact, this has been the most savage election environment I’ve seen in my lifetime. Well, guess what: it’s going to get worse. The Left is making up its own rules: dishonest reporting is acceptable for the good of the cause, the use of the law as a tool to intimidate both conservative politicians and citizens is de rigueur, “astroturfing” – the list goes on and on. I’m not advocating the use of smears and lies and threats. I am, however, going on record as stating that those who want to change America into something that most citizens would find repulsive, and who are not shy about using foul means to do so, are fair game for the kind of “vetting” they’re doing to everybody else.
4) Think ACORN and voter fraud are going to be on the front-burner of the new administration? I don’t either. It’s up to activist citizens to keep bringing these attempts to undermine democracy to the attention of the appropriate national, state and local officials. And to the MSM, as well; there are still some honest reporters and newspapers out there, and we’ve always got Fox News (at least until the “Fairness Doctrine” is legislated).
5) We need new blood in the party at both the local and national levels. Sarah Palin is a great start. Bobby Jindal has a bright future. But as I mentioned under item #1, it is essential that the Republican Party develop a set of ideals around which a core of passionately committed would-be representatives, senators and presidential candidates can coalesce. The American people need to be offered a vision; if not, they’ll settle, as they have this time around, for a hallucination.
Oh, and by the way; to Peggy Noonan, Christopher Buckley, David Brooks, et al…
“Bien fait, mes collègues!”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Neville Chamberlain, with a hat. WOW!...lol.
ReplyDeleteAs truly disturbing as the situation of the last 2-3 years of Obama making his successful 'run' to the White House is...In addition to your wonderfully articulated post, We must also keep our senses of humor about us (those on our side of thought). The other side has no humor.
I completely agree with every point you have made, wonderful virtual friend.
The fact remains, that in pining the people in power to the wall,'they' have learned and learned well, that bringing out fact(s), will be considered...One, an attack biased on skin color: Two, an attack from extremists of the right. The third, everyone thinks THEIR GUY or GAL, in power is THE best...mainly for the fact of the money that their guy or gal, lines their pockets with. One very vivid case in point...Jack Murtha.
Team Obama made those two points, in their running of a very slick, clever and dirty campaign.
Our nation has had a go around with socialist theory in the past. The initials FDR, come to mind. It was hidden for the fact that the U.S. was fighting and successfully so, TWO unidentifiable forces of tyranny.
One of those forces had the same evil ideology, that resurgent radical Islamist ideology has.
Charles Martel stopped that attempt. WE stopped the radical warlords/Gods of the Japanese.
Those of sane mind today, must halt this present day attempt of radical Islam to control the hearts and mind literally, of the world.
My antipathy of Obama came not from the color of his skin, but from the complete lack of "content of character" of the man.
You are correct in stating in so many words, that our present day media...Print, radio or on screen are nothing but propagandists for a way of life that you, myself and the millions that voted for McCain, find repugnant.
OH, if you in fact begin a new blog, try Wordpress. Wordpress has its faults...BUT one they do NOT have is the 'eye test' prior to posting comments....lol.
AND you can easily block, idiots such as myself from commenting.
I would have suggested a 'group blog', but my record concerning that, is zero....BUT in my defense it was my own damn fault for putting a person on an equal footing, as the guy that started the blog.
In a word. WRONG!
Anyhoo, not being close, unless one considers the distance between our third planet from the sun and the now shamed FORMER planet, Pluto to be close, in the use of words and grammar (mine are both dead) as you are, I will end my drivel.
I have an eye test to take....:)
I just failed my 'eye test'...must have something to do with these damn glasses and turning 65 years of age in a few days.
Oh NOES, another 'eye test' or four...lol.
Seems we've decided to go with the clothes that have no emperor.
ReplyDeleteThankfully his coattails weren't long enough to produce a super majority. Republicans can still filibuster, just as well since they'll be cranky for fours years.
Retread
WV: torpho. Heh.
Well said, Paco, on all points. There are a few bright spots out there (Jindal, Palin, others), but the clueless masses are on the rise, with The Mighty O! on point.
ReplyDeleteI will try, but people seem to crave the false comfort of someone else making the decisions.
I want to be part of any new blog you start, Paco. As Virtual Friend el Cid (be still, my heart, he doesn't LOOK 65) has warned you against 'group' blogging, I'm a much better commenter than I am blogger. In my opinion. And I think I'm going to begin giving my REAL opinions, not just fluffing along to be "part of" the Cool Kids. I did that for enough years growing up, I'm middle-aged now, & I have to fight for what I believe is best for my granddaughter.
ReplyDeleteThanks for what you do. I'll help if I can.
Oh CRAP! Not enough caffeine, OR complete stupidity.
ReplyDeleteCorrecting parts of my senile or damn close to...WORDY comment.
First: those two points. Ummm, dope...that's why THIRD was invented as a word.
Second: TWO unidentifiable forces of tyranny. DUH! identifiable
OH Noes, another 'eye test' or ten....LOL.
Dear kc, I never want your heart "still"....lol. BUT thank you.
Thanks, El Cid. If I do start another blog, it probably will be Wordpress; Blogger has had some well-publicized problems with, ahem, freedom of speech issues (BTW, you know, of course, that the gentleman in the picture is Petain).
ReplyDeleteKC: The new blog I have in mind would be radically different from this one. It would probably be primarily a link dump for news stories and original investigative research focused on Democratic legislation, voter fraud issues, and donk skullduggery, in general. The idea would be for readers to e:mail the posts to interested parties (including their own senators and congressmen) to (a) give Republicans ammunition in their fight for transparency in government (clearly threatened by Democratic control of both the White House and Congress), and (b)let Democrats know their actions are being watched and publicized. I'd be counting on readers to forward relevant links that I could post.
Of course, for those interested in slapstick and other forms of low comedy, I'd still maintain this blog.
Paco, slapstick & 'low' comedy are not the sole purpose of this blog...it is also mindless fun! And even more important, it's a tool to use toward improved mental health after the tedium & blather spewn by our 'betters.'
ReplyDeletePetain?
ReplyDeleteGosh Paco, then he's the guy that first made, Vichyssoise.
Imaginot that....lol.
The impression I get is that Obama's been deliberately vague in his campaign style, creating hopes among the far left that his slogans 'hope'! and 'change'! and 'believe'! really indicate his policy positions (ie, the predictable left-liberal list relating to gay marriage, affirmative action, etc.) In practice, I wouldn't be too surprised if Obama is a much more conservative leader - he'll have to be if he wants to keep on appealing to most Americans. Indeed, he could reach out to Republicans with bipartisan legislation at a number of points - I get the impression that that's his style. (This is coming from an Australian, mind, who has had little direct experience with American politics.)
ReplyDeleteThe other thing to bear in mind, I think, is that a lot of the traditional red-state voters who have turned to the Democrats have done so as a protest against Bush-style leadership, post-New Orleans flood and post-Wall Street financial crisis. This is entirely understandable, and I reckon the vast majority of them will drift back to the right in the years to come.
Indeed, he could reach out to Republicans with bipartisan legislation at a number of points - I get the impression that that's his style.
ReplyDeleteNot if you examine his state legislative days; he voted almost exclusively along Democrat party lines, when he wasn't voting "Present".
There's also the incident where he publicly reached across the aisle with McCain, and almost immediately backtracked, resulting in an interesting letter exchange.
So don't count on that being his style. He seems more like a windsock in a storm than anything else.
I'd say that Obama is extremely cautious, which isn't the same thing as being conservative, but it may stop him from doing anything dramatically awful, at least at first. This, if anything, makes him even more dangerous, because it enables him, and his ideological brethren, to pursue potentially radical policies in incremental fashion - then, like the experimental frog that is placed in water which is very slowly brought to a boil, we're cooked before we know it.
ReplyDeleteFantastic round-up, Paco. "...a flashy, but dangerous, poseur..." I think when all is said and done, that's about it. There was a big slice of American Idol in this election just as there was when smiley, nice Kevin Rudd was favoured over bald, irascible hard-case John Howard last year. Australians are slowly beginning to appreciate how dumb this was but the process takes time.
ReplyDeleteC.L.: Onset of buyer's remorse in 5,4,3...
ReplyDelete"Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace"
ReplyDelete-- Danton
Mojo: Exactement.
ReplyDeleteTimT's comment above merely underlines the fact that MSM reportage leaves such an impression. I remember the bus depot still full of buses in New Orleans, and the fact that the local government failed to cope with things within their remit. But the MSM wanted to blame Bush, and they succeeded. The financial crisis also has huge tracts of blame which should be directed to the Democrat side of the house, but will not be.
ReplyDeleteThose who fail to properly read history are destined to repeat the mistakes.
As Paco said, buyers' remorse in 5,4,3,...
I would like to add that, unless Obama turns out to be different to the description on the packaging, I fear that the USA will not be a superpower come the next election.
ReplyDelete