The message should be apparent for card-carrying Republicans and for all those unaffiliated voters who still cling to the belief that there can be such a thing as “good government.” Capturing the White House is now and always will be a consummation devoutly to be wished. But if changing the direction of this country from the course Barack Obama appears to be plotting for us is our primary objective, then unseating Harry Reid as Senate leader and controlling both houses of Congress is equally important.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
We've got to get rid of this guy
Yeah, Obama, too. But Harry Reid's the one I'm talking about. Here's Fred Grandy on the importance of taking back the Senate:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Harry Reid just got re-elected. He's not up again until 2016. Remember Sharron Angle?
ReplyDeleteOf course, should Reid suddenly have to vacate his office, then the Governor of Nevada, a Republican, would appoint a replacement.
We'll settle for knocking him off the Senate Majority Leader perch, Iso. Maybe the humiliation will be too much and he'll retire then.
ReplyDelete"Back to Searchlight!"
ReplyDeleteDeborah Leigh said... Isophorone, I remember the ballot machines acting up that night, and then, surprise, surprise, Harry was re-elected. The only ways dingy Harry (ht Mark Levin) will go out is in a pine box. If you've ever seen his home town, Searchlight, you'd know it's not the retirement spot any senator has picked out. I'll bet he only goes there once or twice a year just to claim it as a residence. And then it's for only a few hours.
ReplyDeleteRebeccaH, you forgot that Democrats don't have the embarrassment gene, which means there can't be humiliation.
I somettimes wonder who now owwns the whorehouse his mom worked at.
ReplyDelete