One cannot say often enough that the victims of crime are, like the perpetrators, more likely to be poor than rich. For example, single-parent households in Britain have a more than one-in-20 chance of being burgled in any given year; and since most burglars are recidivists, indeed multiply so, it follows that the class of victim is much larger than the class of perpetrator. Leniency toward criminals is not therefore a form of sympathy for the poor, but a failure to take either their lives or their property seriously. For Miéville to talk of “panicked reaction” in these circumstances is a form of moral exhibitionism. He is showing off in front of his peers.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
The eternal moral posturing of the Left
Theodore Dalrymple considers the vacuous maunderings of novelist Chin Miéville, who believes that the sentences handed out to rioters in London’s most recent spasm of social collapse were too “severe.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The left are morally bankrupt. Hence their need to posture morally.
ReplyDeleteProgressives have their own version of Descartes' “I think, therefore I am".
ReplyDelete“I think, therefore I'm right".
Confession, I like the blokes books. A little tendency to try to shock for shocks value, but overall good.
ReplyDeleteBut hes a marxist schollar, a genuine studier and believer of the stupidest political and social system ever.
It takes a special form of arrogance and stupidity to be smart enough to follow Marxism.
Sorry to be picky but it's China Miéville.
ReplyDelete