Why settle for being in the tank for Obama, when you can be the tank, itself?
The Washington Post: Doggedly pursuing relevant news stories (with all the zeal for the chase of a three-legged basset hound with bunions and a head cold).
“Mmmmm! Did somebody mention dog?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Deborah Leigh said...This, of course, is in response to the "Obama ate dog" story. On the face, one would question the validity of either revelation, however, upon revisiting the impact on each candidate, it is easy to see that the Obama story is more relevant. Romney said he did stupid things, and apologized for any ill feelings the long forgotten incident might have caused. Obama, on the other hand, didn't speak to his, because to do so might upset the dog eaters. It leads to questions of what else he learned besides dog tastes good. What about the madrassa he attended? Very concerning.
ReplyDeleteThese ridiculous attempts to paint Romney as some kind of heartless monster are so pathetic. Pranks in high school, really? The precious petal who wrote that article should have attended my high school in small town Texas during the 60s.
ReplyDelete