Tuesday, September 18, 2012

God is not mocked

Ok, here’s the thing. I am a Christian, and, as such, I take offense when people – edgy “artistic” types, for example – blaspheme my Lord. The purpose of blaspheming is not really to attack God, in whom the blasphemer does not believe, but to insult those who do believe in Him. At its most basic level, this is simply very aggressive bad manners. However, I have always held that the sacredness and purity of the Lord is inherent to His being, and that these attributes are in no way actually diminished by the attacks or disrespect or simply the agnosticism of unbelievers. In other words, if a person blasphemes…well, in the worst-case scenario, it’s his problem, not God’s.

Many Muslims, on the other hand, become apoplectic when you show disrespect toward their Prophet, frequently acting with, quite literally, homicidal intentions. It is almost as if the special place that Mohammed enjoys in their belief system is somehow dependent on everybody either believing in his sanctity (if that is the right word in the Islamic context), or keeping mum on the subject of their disbelief, lest the tiniest skeptical or scornful voice should bring down their entire cosmology. This level of violent zealotry seems more akin to an expression of metaphysical tribalism, totemic or fetish-like in nature, than to genuinely humane religious belief - a sign, as the old Buffalo Springfield song has it, saying “Hooray for our side.”

President Obama thinks that this madness should be humored, even at the cost of our constitutional rights. But we’re not talking about the harmless character from Arsenic and Old Lace who thought he was Teddy Roosevelt. We’re talking about people who see themselves as the sword of their jealous god, about people who want to kill us. The odds of having any success in changing the minds of such folk, by trying to reason with them or by paying them tribute, are on the order of slim to none.

8 comments:

  1. You've described the situation perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You cannot reason with a psychopath - you either lock them up, or you kill them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. … and President Obama is not a Christian …

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  4. So dissing Mo is blasphemy? Blasphemy is dissing G-d. That would indicate that Muslims think of Mo as a deity, not as a human being, if dissing him is blasphemy. So every one of those clowns rioting on account of some alleged dissing of Mo (because they riot at rumors that prove to be false, too) is a polytheist, since they must worship two deities (at least): Allah and Muhammed. That's also punished by death in Islam. I can't wait to see the results of universal death penalties for universal polytheism there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not Christian, and I agree with you 100%, Paco. Thank you for stating it so clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This level of violent zealotry seems more akin to an expression of metaphysical tribalism…

    I think it is more simple than that. Many people realize that being a bullying totalitarian often works (until it doesn't).

    The odds of having any success in changing the minds of such folk, by trying to reason with them or by paying them tribute, are on the order of slim to none.

    Among other differences, in Islam it is insisted that Jesus was neither the son of God nor was crucified. So, for as long as there are muslims who aren't interested in live and let live, as a Christian, your contradicting the koran will be seen blasphemy. Notice that people demanding "respect" for religions don't seem to think it should be reciprocal – they never suggest that they would let Paco be a censor of other people.

    You'd think the least Obama would do is to make some comment about them "bitterly clinging to their mobs and religion."

    ReplyDelete
  7. ..."bitterly clinging to their mobs and religion."

    Very nicely played!

    ReplyDelete