We took samples from goats. We sent samples from sheeps. We took samples from pawpaws. We sent samples from car oil. And we took samples from other different things. And we took the samples to the laboratory without them knowing. And we even named all the samples. Like the sample of car oil. We named it Jabil Hamza, 30 years old, male. The results came back negative. When we took a sample from a Jackfruit (Durian) we named it Sarah Samuel, 45 years old, female. The results came back inconclusive. When we took samples from a Pawpaw we named it Elizabeth Ane, 26 years old, female. The result from the Pawpaw came back positive that it has corona. That means the liquid from a pawpaw is positive. We took samples from (a bird) called Kware. The results came back positive. We took samples from a rabbit. The results came back undeterminent. We took samples from a goat and the results came back positive. We took samples from a sheep and it came back negative and so on and so on. And so now you see this you have taken samples and the results come back positive and they have the corona. That means all the pawpaws should be in isolation also… The goat should be in isolation also.
Monday, May 11, 2020
President Magufull of Tanzania
What a card!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
How embarrassed should our own "experts" be?
A lady I met recently said she had a relative who was killed in a car accident. The death was attributed to COVID, not the accident, or the underlying medical conditions. He did not have COVID.
A friend of ours works for a large hospital in San Antonio. She said the one statistic that is consistently ommited is the number of people in hospital. I've noticed that population statiscs are not given. Also, the news is just beginning to mention recoveries.
Post a Comment