Friday, May 4, 2012

Under Obama, might not "Julia" just as easily have been aborted?

Paul Ryan criticizes the assumptions behind the Obama campaign's "creepy" web site, "The Life of Julia".

For those who have somehow missed the story, "Julia" is Obama's idea of Everywoman, a potentially hapless doofus who hasn't got a prayer of making it in this world without the meaty helping hand of the state. And yet, as the title of this post suggests, "Julia" could just as easily have met another fate - and under the modern liberal ethos, that's a perfectly acceptable outcome, too (that's probably why the Obama campaign picks up the thread of "Julia's" life at the age of three).

3 comments:

Reaganite Independent said...

Good point, linked at my place:

Perusing The Righty Blogosphere...

missred said...

Julia's mother is probably on welfare

Michael Lonie said...

Well she didn't seem to be married. Welfare is the popular alternative to having a father around (especially popular among "Progressives" for the Great Unwashed). No wonder Julia didn't bother finding a live father when she wanted a pet child of her very own. Growing up without one and going to public schools, she may not know what the word means. Presumably Obamacare paid for the sperm donor as well.