Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Just be patient, Ben

After the election, we hear that Barry's going to have a lot more flexibility.
President Barack Obama won't meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the sidelines of September's U.N. General Assembly in New York, a spokesman confirmed Tuesday after Israel's Haaretz newspaper reported that the White House had turned down a request for talks. But it's not a snub, the aide said. It's due to Obama's busy election-year schedule.
That's right. Obama keeping his narrow arse in the White House for another four years is the main thing; actually doing anything useful while he's there is really a bridge too far.

Update: I guess his nibs is too busy to worry about this, too.

Update II: My bad. Looks like Obama's people issued a strong statement after all (NOT!)

H/T: Jeff

Update III: At least some in the American Jewish community seem to be having second thoughts about Mr. Hope 'n Change.

H/T: Captain Heinrichs

By the way, does anybody know anything about this movie that's supposedly made the Prophet's fans so frisky?
Posted by at

11 comments:

  1. JeffSSeptember 11, 2012 at 7:37 PM

    Oh, come now, Paco! Of course Obama worried about the Cairo embassy.

    He worried enough to permit a nauseating act of abasement and surrender to a bunch of screaming barbarians.

    ReplyDelete
  2. PacoSeptember 11, 2012 at 7:58 PM

    Jeff: My disgust knows no bounds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. missredSeptember 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM

    I have said it before, he is guilty of treason

    ReplyDelete
  4. JeffSSeptember 11, 2012 at 8:32 PM

    It's only getting worse.

    Annihilate these savages.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Michael LonieSeptember 11, 2012 at 9:16 PM

    I may have to see that movie (I very rarely go to movies) just because these swine are protesting it.

    If "Islam" is at war with the USA, we should accomodate the Islamists' wish to be at war with us. As for the asymmetric warfare they practice against us, we can get asymmetric too, in the opposite direction. We could even do it without going nuclear.

    The world has not seen the USA really angry since 1945. I thought 9/11 would do that, but we restrained our anger. Our enemies should not want to make us angry; ask the Japanese. Maybe we would be more respected around the world if we let loose our justified anger at the constant attacks on us by barbarians. I'm sure we would at least be more feared, which might be enough.

    ReplyDelete
  6. missredSeptember 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM

    Well said, Michael. I still don't know what this movie is that they are protesting.
    Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the blitz of the allies to Dresden, Mainz, Hamburg, Pforzheim and Kassel.
    Maybe then we can shut them up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. YojimboSeptember 11, 2012 at 9:42 PM


    In that part of the world fear and respect are but two sides of the same coin.

    ReplyDelete
  8. rinardmanSeptember 11, 2012 at 9:43 PM

    Obama presidency = SCOAMF

    ReplyDelete
  9. MinicaptSeptember 12, 2012 at 6:10 AM

    For those who are interested:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmodVun16Q4

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  10. mojoSeptember 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM

    My personal feeling (YMMV):
    Any time a Muslim starts screaming and ranting about blasphemy and "disrespect" of the "prophet", it should be legal to shoot them. Just as a preventative measure, for public safety.

    ReplyDelete
  11. RebeccaHSeptember 12, 2012 at 1:58 PM

    I'm repeating (and probably paraphrasing, but not by much) a comment someone made elsewhere:

    "The United States supports free speech and does not tell its citizens what to say. Now get off our wall, or we'll shoot you."

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)