Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Why, indeed?

Paul Joseph Watson asks why is there such a discrepancy between reporting on Muslim-sponsored massacres of Christians, and extremist attacks on mosques.

Part of the answer - not the whole answer, to be sure - is that Islam is not a western belief system, is not, like Christianity, a fundamental building block of western civilization, which the Left is hell-bent on destroying; therefore, attacks on Christians and their places of worship is just part of the completely understandable chipping away of our hopelessly biased culture. Whereas the lamentations in the press and among Democrat politicians over attacks on Muslims and their symbols are part and parcel of the Left's promotion of "diversity" as a method of weakening our culture so that it can ultimately be replaced with a completely secular - and conveniently statist - way of life. Muslims who take comfort in the "protectiveness" of the Left today likely will find that they are simply among those useful political tools destined to be crushed at some future date.

3 comments:

rinardman said...

Muslims who take comfort in the "protectiveness" of the Left today likely will find that they are simply among those useful political tools destined to be crushed at some future date.

Well, it could get interesting when those muslim political tools decide the "protectiveness" of the useful idiots (aka infidels) of the Left is no longer needed or welcomed. The Left's drive toward a completely secular way of life may hit a rather stout roadblock called "Islamism", that refuses to be crushed.

bruce said...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6957349/Confronting-photo-shows-sniper-roof-shrine-Melbourne-Anzac-Day-dawn-service.html

Today's Australia's Veterans Day.

HAL9000 said...

Leftists who take comfort in the "protectiveness" of the Muslims tomorrow likely will find that they are simply among those useful political tools destined to be crushed by the Jihad at some future date.

There, I fixed it for you.