"There are countless horrible things happening all over the world and horrible people prospering, but we must never allow them to disturb our equanimity or deflect us from our sacred duty to sabotage and annoy them whenever possible." -Auberon Waugh
Since many 'white people' in the current population only came to the US after the Civil War, blacks as an older American population obviously will have more 'slave owner' blood than 'whites' now.
So since many blacks are partly desecended from slave owners and most whites are not, whatever effect 'slave owner blood' has should be seen more in them than in whites.
Haven't blacks told us that they often have an ancestor who was a rich slave owner? Poor whites of course could not afford to own slaves.
Is that why blacks behave like a spoiled elite, because that's who they are descended from? Is that why they look down on poor 'crackers'? Because their grt grt grt grandaddy was the guy in the big house and they can't shake the elitism? You can extend this argument in ways they won't like.
It doesn't matter a whit, bruce. If you're white in America, you "directly benefited from slavery", even if you had ancestors who were active in the Underground Railroad before the Civil War (my grandmother's family in Ohio are proud of that part of their history).
Apparently, slaves created and built EVERYTHING in America, even the manufacturing in the Northern states decades after they outlawed slavery in the first years of the 19th century. Of course, we have idiots, ostensibly on the right, who claim "there were more slaves in the North than in the South" at the time of the "War of Northern Aggression" launched "illegally by the traitor Abraham Lincoln". They tend to get angry with me when I point out that if you called a Missourian, a Kentuckian, or a Marylander, a "Yankee" in 1860, you'd have a fight on your hands.
Guess what Spiny, my ancestor was related by marriage (not blood to me) to 'the largest slave owner in Trinidad during the nineteenth century': https://www.amazon.com.au/Slave-Master-Trinidad-Nineteenth-Century-Atlantic-ebook/dp/B07M5GJVQ5
He even wrote a book which says you have to whip your house servants or they back talk.
I feel a bit guilty that Americans are being blamed for all this while I'm over here where no one says anything about it. Sorry guys! I have other direct ancestors who made up for what my people did to black people (one founded Gandhi's and Mandella's Congress Party no less). But we did nuthin for our US cousins and now you're getting blamed.
'Apparently, slaves created and built EVERYTHING in America' Say hello to Bruce Pascoe, a whitefella Australian who discovered a few years ago that he was more aboriginal than Neville Bonner and Lionel Rose combined. Pascoe is the current darling of the local lefties. Google Dark Emu. Or just take everything the Afro-Am crazies are saying and give it an Australian accent.
9 comments:
The left killed satire dead, so it has to be real.
First it's one, then the other.
Since many 'white people' in the current population only came to the US after the Civil War, blacks as an older American population obviously will have more 'slave owner' blood than 'whites' now.
So since many blacks are partly desecended from slave owners and most whites are not, whatever effect 'slave owner blood' has should be seen more in them than in whites.
Haven't blacks told us that they often have an ancestor who was a rich slave owner? Poor whites of course could not afford to own slaves.
Is that why blacks behave like a spoiled elite, because that's who they are descended from? Is that why they look down on poor 'crackers'? Because their grt grt grt grandaddy was the guy in the big house and they can't shake the elitism? You can extend this argument in ways they won't like.
It doesn't matter a whit, bruce. If you're white in America, you "directly benefited from slavery", even if you had ancestors who were active in the Underground Railroad before the Civil War (my grandmother's family in Ohio are proud of that part of their history).
Apparently, slaves created and built EVERYTHING in America, even the manufacturing in the Northern states decades after they outlawed slavery in the first years of the 19th century. Of course, we have idiots, ostensibly on the right, who claim "there were more slaves in the North than in the South" at the time of the "War of Northern Aggression" launched "illegally by the traitor Abraham Lincoln". They tend to get angry with me when I point out that if you called a Missourian, a Kentuckian, or a Marylander, a "Yankee" in 1860, you'd have a fight on your hands.
Guess what Spiny, my ancestor was related by marriage (not blood to me) to 'the largest slave owner in Trinidad during the nineteenth century':
https://www.amazon.com.au/Slave-Master-Trinidad-Nineteenth-Century-Atlantic-ebook/dp/B07M5GJVQ5
He even wrote a book which says you have to whip your house servants or they back talk.
I feel a bit guilty that Americans are being blamed for all this while I'm over here where no one says anything about it. Sorry guys! I have other direct ancestors who made up for what my people did to black people (one founded Gandhi's and Mandella's Congress Party no less). But we did nuthin for our US cousins and now you're getting blamed.
'Apparently, slaves created and built EVERYTHING in America'
Say hello to Bruce Pascoe, a whitefella Australian who discovered a few years ago that he was more aboriginal than Neville Bonner and Lionel Rose combined. Pascoe is the current darling of the local lefties. Google Dark Emu. Or just take everything the Afro-Am crazies are saying and give it an Australian accent.
Lot of Australians are named Bruce aren't they?
Considering how lefties are -- in all seriousness -- labeling sleep as "racist", I'm going with real.
Post a Comment