To praise Che, one must overlook mountains of evidence concerning his crimes. But why would anyone do that, willingly? Because some people — especially those who see all of history as nothing but class struggle — need a saint to venerate, someone who they think embodies the cause of the downtrodden. Ironically, though most Che lovers tend not to admit it, they act very much like religious zealots: As they prefer to see it, Che was a saintly crusader for the poor, so everything he did must have been good, and anyone harmed by him must have deserved it. So what if he killed Cubans willy-nilly, without trials, including plenty of poor peasants? Or helped establish one of the most repressive regimes on earth? Or built concentration camps for dissidents and gays, including one with a sign over the front gate that read “Work will make real men out of you”? It’s what needed to be done. It was just. And in this warped religious view of Che the idol, and of politics in general, we who call that false history into question are worse than heretics. We are the unjust cretins who still deserve to be killed by the likes of Che.Update: Professor Eire gets some hate mail.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Yale professor denounces Che statue in Galway
Carlos Eire writes an impassioned letter (which went unpublished by the Irish Times, but was picked up by the Galway Advertiser). A sample:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The language in that missive reads like English as a second language (especially the claim of "tenth-generation American"). It's flowery and overblown, much the way people from the Middle East sound, and note the mention of Israel, 9/11, and the Palestinians.
ReplyDelete