Monday, April 29, 2013

Imbecilia

I was somewhat surprised to find this article at MarketWatch, a popular online stock market site.

Entitled “Capitalism is killing our morals, our future”, it is written by one Paul Farrell, and is essentially a paen to Harvard philosopher Michael Sandel, who thinks that the thing that is killing our society is the market economy. It is an article that is positively besotted with polyunsaturated stupid, not only in what it affirmatively claims, without any scientific evidence at all, but in what it omits, which, principally, includes any reference to the great shortcomings of alternative forms of economic organization. Perhaps the most enormous howler in the article is the total failure to see how the nefarious alliances between big corporations, banks and government represent, not the epitome, but the death, of genuine free enterprise.

Farrell is a peddler of psychobabble dressed up as financial and economic analysis (check out this very pointed critique), and Sandel (a tenured Harvard professor) is an advocate of communitarianism, perpetually in search of a non-secular basis for morality which, somehow, always seems neatly to coincide with garden variety progressivism and its insistence on collective (read “statist”) control (David Gordon deals with Sandel handily, in this article).

Submitted here as further evidence that high-priced university instruction is increasingly an exercise in fraud (why isn’t Sandel, who is critical of the market economy’s tendency to put a price on everything, dispensing his wisdom, free of charge, from a bench in some public park?)

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous 1 said:

    Harvard received $150 million in Stimulus funds. Looks like it stimulated B.S.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Farrell sounds like the type of fruitloop our colleges seem to be producing these days. I actually studied Michael Sandel's earlier work at uni 20 years ago:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_and_the_Limits_of_Justice
    which is a rather good criticism of the basis of liberalism. For me, his arguments pointed towards conservatism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gordon is defending Rawls. It gets too technical, but I happen to think the whole basis of liberalism from JS Mill onwards is false, so I won't support Rawls. Especially as liberalism was invented by and for members of a Judeo-Christian tradition. Take religious beliefs away and it doesn't work. That's exactly what we're seeing around us. But Sandel may not get as any students if he says that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whenever I see "Harvard" appended to someone's name, I tune out immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Some ideas are so stupid only an intellectual would believe them. Paul Ferrell proves Orwell right.

    Bravo, elitist academic nitwit!

    ReplyDelete
  6. "(why isn’t Sandel, who is critical of the market economy’s tendency to put a price on everything, dispensing his wisdom, free of charge, from a bench in some public park?)"

    The way Sokrates did.

    ReplyDelete