...as toilet paper supplies continue to be tight.
Seriously, what better use for one of the main propaganda outlets of the Democratic Party? Certainly, the paper's value as an objective news source is practically nil, as evidenced by yet another hatchet job against a Republican figure: "ANOTHER DISHONEST SMEAR BY THE WASHINGTON POST".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
But the price of a subscription makes it more costly. Only birds in cages will use the WP.
OT What did pre-toilet paper people use?
The point of the Post story is to convey the impression that Governor Noem’s reliance on voluntary measures, education, persuasion, and close cooperation with federal agencies, other governors, and the private sector is a failure. Strikingly absent from the Post’s hit job, however, is the bottom line: how many South Dakotans have actually succumbed to COVID-19? The answer: 6, and none have been reported within the last week. South Dakota has one of the best coronavirus records of any state, but the Post didn’t tell its readers that. It would have ruined the narrative.
Naturally -- why would the democrats and their media allies want a successful COVID-19 mitigation strategy that doesn't include arbitrary limits on personal freedom and civil rights?
I was thinking of swiping them out of recycle bins.
I see the Wash Post's preferred pronoun is xi.
We had a separate outhouse in the 1950s, full of poisonous Red-Back spiders (always check under the seat!). My dad had grown up during wartime rationing using newspaper and always kept a supply of torn hand-size bits on a nail, didn't switch to the sissy stuff until he got much older. But best to let the ink dry on the newsprint, so he'd use week or two old papers. Simpler times.
Post a Comment