Hey, if Arafat could get a Nobel Peace Prize, and Obama could get one for merely existing, and Walter Duranty can get a Pulitzer for dastardly lies, why not give it to the NY Times for its bogus anti-American “history” lesson known as the 1619 Project?
Saturday, May 9, 2020
The New York Times wins another liar's trophy
Maybe it's time to retire the Pulitzer Prize - "The greatest Pulitzer since Duranty: the 1619 Project".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
They have to keep propping each other up so they're just getting ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteHow about CNN's Pulitzer for reporting the leak James Clapper gave them about the 4chan hoax sometimes referred to as the "Moscow Ritz Golden Showers Party".
ReplyDeleteI'm serious.
Yes, the ridiculous fable about notorious germophobe Donald Trump paying a couple of Russian hookers to piss on a bed Obama slept in was concocted at 4chan's "politically incorrect" /pol/ board - and emailed to anti-Trump GOP ratface Rick Wilson.
The unanswered question is which of his "Johns" did he pass it to, McCain or Brennan? (The /pol/acks still think it was McCain.)
The sad thing is, people out there still trust the Fishwrap of Choice™, CNN, and similar Lame Stream Media.
ReplyDeleteAlas, some of the independent news outlets are unreliable, if not bat s**t crazy.
One must sort through the gravel to find the occasional grain of gold.
The Pulitzer Prize has been downgraded to trash, as has the Nobel Peace Prize. It should embarrass anyone who receives one these days.
ReplyDelete