Monday, December 21, 2020

Stealing America

There's an interesting video at FrontPage that provides a good quick overview of the election "anomalies", along with an explanation of China's likely role.

Meanwhile, William Barr, head of the Department of Just Us, defaults to Complacent Bureaucrat Mode, refusing to name a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden, and, more importantly, declining to take any action on seizing voting machines. Why? Because "although there was likely some fraud in the election, he had not seen evidence of enough to change its outcome."

Oh. Just a little fraud is ok, then. I'd like to know, in depth, what kind of investigating the DOJ has attempted in connection with the more common types of fraud, as well as with the technological manipulation that seems pretty evident. I do not find it credible that Barr's people have done any kind of serious investigation - precisely because they do not take the allegations seriously (or they do, but decline to act on them for reasons as yet to be determined). Have investigators even talked to some of the hundreds of people who have testified as to what they saw election night? How do you go about determining whether the ballots pulled from under tables in Georgia and counted after ballot watchers were sent home were legal? Do investigators know how many such ballots there were? What about poll watchers in Detroit who were prevented from watching what was going on inside the building where ballots were being counted? Has anybody in the DOJ deposed them? How does one explain the sudden halt to the counting of ballots in several states simultaneously - states where Trump had been significantly ahead, but where he fell behind once the counting resumed the next day? How about the mail-in ballots that were "mailed" but had no creases in the paper? How about the counties where more mail-in ballots were received than were ever sent out? And on and on. 

Barr says he sees no evidence of massive fraud; I say, I see no indication that Barr has done anything but oversee the most cursory glance at the evidence. Barr owes us a more detailed explanation of what he and his people have actually done in investigating this disaster. We are far beyond the point where I am taking anybody's mere word for anything.

4 comments:

Veeshir said...

So according to the Dept of "JUstice", a little fraud is A-OK?
So what level of law-breaking is worth their time?

Paco said...

Well, anything that you or I might do at the margin of legality is fair game, I'm sure.

RebeccaH said...

This election was stolen. They aren't going to convince me otherwise, unless they can explain away all these "anomalies". And they can't do that.

Gregoryno6 said...

Barr has turned out to be a non-event. I would like to think however that PDJT got his number early on and used him as a smokescreen, organising quiet investigations while Barr was happily communing with the media and fellow RINOs.