Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"There are countless horrible things happening all over the world and horrible people prospering, but we must never allow them to disturb our equanimity or deflect us from our sacred duty to sabotage and annoy them whenever possible." -Auberon Waugh
That pistol having (effectively) a one inch barrel makes it a belly gun -- the channel sight is superfluous, as the bullet wouldn't have much spin to be accurate after a few feet. Especially for .25 ACP, which has little stopping power, unless you are aiming directly at a vulnerable part of the body (e.g., the head). Its main threat comes from the reality that no one wants bullet holes in their skin.
ReplyDeleteBut still, a clever design, and useful in close quarters situations.
It would have been interesting to see that design in a .380 or 9mm.
ReplyDeleteHmmmm .... ..... methinks that .380 would be the optimum choice for that design, but it would be interesting to see how 9mm faired.
ReplyDeleteI would expect a somewhat larger configuration for a 9mm (especially a longer barrel). For the actual size, .380 is about the best you could hope for. Hell, I'd take it in a .32 ACP.
ReplyDeleteTrue dat about the 9mm.
ReplyDeleteAnd .32 ACP would be an improvement over .25 ACP -- anything would, IMHO. I've seen .25 ACP ammunition, and it's most effective at either point blank range, or stuffed down your assailant's gullet until they choke to death. Throwing a box of .25 ACP at the bad guy would result in only gales of laughter.