Peer far enough back in the human family lineage, and you'll find a fishy ancestor that looked surprisingly like a shark.Once again, the anatomical reconstruction experts at Paco World News Daily (PWND) have weighed in, creating an artist's conception of what this ancient fishy ancestor probably looked like:
In fact, this now-extinct fish was among the first to split from sharks, whose bones are made of cartilage, to evolve into a line of tough-boned species that includes everything from bony fish to human beings. A new analysis finds that this controversial class of animals was more shark-like than expected.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Hmmm. I'm beginning to think these experts are a one-trick pony.
No, sorry, this is a photo of a descendant of the grouper, flat, with eyes on one side of his body - indicative of a particular "political" philosophy - said politics dependent on whatever is more conducive to monetary gain.
ReplyDeleteA species that isn't vulnerable to extinction, but not one that contributes to the continuing evolution of mankind. We hope.
That's a human head? Could of fooled me.
ReplyDeleteThat's not a distant baboon ancestor?
ReplyDeleteR-man: No reason it might not be. I can kind of see a resemblance; what I took to be the face does sort of look like the south end of a north-bound baboon.
ReplyDeleteDeborah Leigh said...Somebody help me with this, please. Man is made in God's image, but we're supposed to believe that man has a common ancestor with a shark or bony fish. Aren't they saying that God is a shark or bony fish?
ReplyDeleteIf Moses only knew he was talking to the Great Celestial Shark/Bony Fish....
John Kerry is a small fish in a big pond. Call him "fry".
No Deborah, they're saying that you're a subhuman for using the term ,"God's image."
ReplyDeleteTherefore, you're only good for fishbait.
You know, like Jews.
ReplyDelete