Peer far enough back in the human family lineage, and you'll find a fishy ancestor that looked surprisingly like a shark.Once again, the anatomical reconstruction experts at Paco World News Daily (PWND) have weighed in, creating an artist's conception of what this ancient fishy ancestor probably looked like:
In fact, this now-extinct fish was among the first to split from sharks, whose bones are made of cartilage, to evolve into a line of tough-boned species that includes everything from bony fish to human beings. A new analysis finds that this controversial class of animals was more shark-like than expected.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Hmmm. I'm beginning to think these experts are a one-trick pony.
7 comments:
No, sorry, this is a photo of a descendant of the grouper, flat, with eyes on one side of his body - indicative of a particular "political" philosophy - said politics dependent on whatever is more conducive to monetary gain.
A species that isn't vulnerable to extinction, but not one that contributes to the continuing evolution of mankind. We hope.
That's a human head? Could of fooled me.
That's not a distant baboon ancestor?
R-man: No reason it might not be. I can kind of see a resemblance; what I took to be the face does sort of look like the south end of a north-bound baboon.
Deborah Leigh said...Somebody help me with this, please. Man is made in God's image, but we're supposed to believe that man has a common ancestor with a shark or bony fish. Aren't they saying that God is a shark or bony fish?
If Moses only knew he was talking to the Great Celestial Shark/Bony Fish....
John Kerry is a small fish in a big pond. Call him "fry".
No Deborah, they're saying that you're a subhuman for using the term ,"God's image."
Therefore, you're only good for fishbait.
You know, like Jews.
Post a Comment