...but the billionaires who are constantly thinking of ways to control population never see themselves as supernumeraries: "Gates’ Secret De-Population Meeting 13 Years Ago Exposed".
Another guest said there was “nothing as crude as a vote,” but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.
“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”
Why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” he said.
One can't help but fancy that anytime people like Gates, Buffett, Soros and assorted Rockefellers get together, there is the unmistakable smell of brimstone.
Updated "Why it isn’t mad to oppose the World Economic Forum".
In short, it’s easy to caricature the WEF and Schwab as something akin to Ian Fleming’s fictious Spectre and its criminal-mastermind Ernst Stavro Blofeld. Yet the agenda now being pursued at settings such as Davos is sufficiently alarming that anyone who believes in preserving things like liberty, sovereignty, and the decentralisation of power should be concerned.
Davos Man should be put on notice: his Great Reset won’t go uncontested.
"Nothing as crude as a vote."
ReplyDeleteTelling statement right there. Reveals an entire mindset, doesn't it?
Oligarchs like these spout depopulation, and yet most of them will migrate from trophy wife to trophy wife, leaving litters of babies as they go.
ReplyDelete“They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” he said.
ReplyDeleteHey, that works both ways. Most of us don't really care what they think. And why would they be worried about people thinking them an alternative world government? Do even they realize that would not be a good thing?
Or do they not want to lose the element of surprise?
I tracked down Executive Action, the 1973 movie about the assassination of JFK, a couple of months ago. I remembered the basic plot, but I'd completely forgotten this exchange.
ReplyDeleteFoster: The real problem is this, James. In two decades, there will be 7 billion human beings on this planet. Most of them brown, yellow or black, all of them hungry, all of them determined to love, and swarm out of their breeding grounds into Europe and North America. Hence, Vietnam. An all-out effort there will give us control of South Asia for decades to come. And with proper planning, we can reduce the population to 550 million by the end of the century. I know. I've seen the data.
James Farrington: We sound rather like gods reading the Doomsday Book, don't we?
Foster: Well, someone has to do it. Not only will the nations affected be better off, but the techniques developed there can be used to reduce our own excess population. Blacks, Puerto Ricans, Mexican-Americans, poverty-prone whites, and so forth.
Some of Hollywood's most notorious lefties were involved in the production of this film. The 'best people' have been looking at ways to reduce their lessers for a long time.