Don't know of any civilian-accessible guns that have that kind of capacity; might be something out there that's belt-fed, or perhaps there is rifle of some sort that will hold a hundred-round drum. But, realistically, this is a non-issue, a booger-man intended to scare people away from conventional high-capacity firearms.
Oh, and I've got news for the Vegetable-in-Chief: multiple rounds in a single chamber, let alone a hundred, would probably cause the weapon to explode.
Everything the left says about firearms is a lie.
ReplyDeleteEverything Biden says... about anything... is a lie.
Anyway, has this retard ever explained why he gave the Taliban something like 300,000 automatic weapons, but demands that US citizens be entirely disarmed? Yes, I know, something something F-15s blah blah blah. How many F-15s did the Taliban use to kick our butts out of Afghanistan?
I did see something about Israel loosening up their Barney Fifeish gun laws to allow the people to have maybe 100 rounds of ammunition and following an old Archie Bunkerism of passing out the pistols (I think they actually broke out the rifles) for former military and security personnel.
ReplyDeleteI'm not big on guns myself, having plinked soda cans with an old 22 rifle at the farm as a kid, but all my kids are bb rifle marksmen thanks to the Issac Walton Lodge near us.
Dirty Old Joe just blabs whatever talking points he thinks he understands, and it doesn't matter if the words match reality. The inside of his mind must be a reverberating echo chamber of massive proportions, and he has to grab at thoughts as they ripple by.
ReplyDeleteThis is a distraction for their base, to avoid talking about Slow Joe shoveling cash into the pockets of terrorists.
ReplyDelete